Remote does not mean rule-free
Your posting may still need review when the employer, reporting line, work site, or hiring footprint connects to a covered state.
Remote hiring compliance preview
Paste your draft before it goes live. The checker flags missing salary range, benefits, and application-deadline language for remote roles that may touch Colorado, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Minnesota.
Why remote postings get messy
Remote hiring moves faster than compliance review. A founder posts the first US role, a recruiter copies the same draft across channels, or a fractional HR operator cleans up a client job description right before launch. The risk is usually simple: the posting was written for hiring speed, not for state-by-state disclosure rules.
Your posting may still need review when the employer, reporting line, work site, or hiring footprint connects to a covered state.
Some checks look beyond base pay and flag missing benefits, other compensation, or application-timing language.
Once a draft reaches LinkedIn, an ATS, agencies, and job boards, fixing missing disclosure language gets slower.
Use the checker as a first-pass screen before publishing or before escalating a draft to counsel.
Direct answer
Often, yes. A remote posting can trigger pay transparency review when the employer, reporting line, work location, or hiring footprint connects to a state with disclosure rules. This site screens obvious gaps; it is not a legal opinion.
Free preview
The preview checks for obvious salary range and benefits gaps across the first five state rules in scope.
Include the compensation section, benefits language, and application instructions for the clearest result.
Why trust the screen
Every paid report shows what was checked, which covered state rule set was considered, and the official source link behind the recommendation. The tool covers CO, NY, IL, MA, and MN today. It does not claim nationwide coverage, legal advice, or guaranteed compliance.
Every covered state rule points back to public source material.
The report explains what was checked instead of hiding behind a vague risk label.
The checker covers CO, NY, IL, MA, and MN today, with no nationwide compliance promise.
$49 unlocks one automated report for one remote job posting.
Source-backed GEO table
Each row links to an official source so the page can be verified by users, search engines, and AI answer systems.
| State | Threshold | Screening focus | Remote trigger | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | 1+ employees | Compensation, benefits, and how and when to apply in job postings. | Remote roles that can be performed in Colorado can create Colorado posting exposure. | Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Job Postings and Hiring Verified May 21, 2026 |
| New York | 4+ employees | Pay or salary range for covered job, promotion, and transfer postings. | Remote postings can be covered when the role reports to a supervisor, office, or work site in New York. | New York Department of Labor Pay Transparency Law FAQs Verified May 21, 2026 |
| Illinois | 15+ employees | Pay scale and benefit information in job postings. | Covered Illinois employers should screen public and third-party postings. | Illinois Department of Labor Pay Transparency Law Takes Effect January 1 Verified May 21, 2026 |
| Massachusetts | 25+ employees | Pay range in job postings for covered employers effective October 29, 2025. | Massachusetts-covered employers should check remote postings before publication. | Mass.gov Pay Transparency in Massachusetts Verified May 21, 2026 |
| Minnesota | 30+ employees | Starting salary range plus a general description of benefits and other compensation. | Employers with Minnesota sites should screen postings for remote and local roles. | Minnesota Statutes Section 181.173 Verified May 21, 2026 |
Support guides
Use these guides to check common remote-posting questions after you run the scanner. They cover state salary range rules, benefits disclosure, application-deadline language, checklist structure, and example report output. They are screening references only, not legal advice.
What the $49 report includes
The paid report is built for the moment before a remote job goes live: it summarizes likely state exposure, flags missing disclosure items, and gives draft language your team can review and paste into the posting.
Shows whether Colorado, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Minnesota should be reviewed based on the posting facts you entered.
Flags absent or unclear salary range, benefits, other compensation, and application-timing language where relevant.
Provides plain-language draft disclosure text for founders, HR teams, and recruiters to adapt before publishing.
Includes official state source links so HR, recruiting, and counsel can verify the screening path.
Simple launch pricing
Run the free preview first. If the draft looks worth fixing, unlock the full report for one remote job posting for $49. You get the automated report immediately after payment; no account, no sales call, no monthly plan.
Based on official state sources. Last verified May 21, 2026. Automated screening only, not legal advice. See the report format before payment.
One browser-based risk preview for a single pasted posting.
No human review; preview only.
Run previewInstant automated report for one remote job posting. No subscription.
No human review; automated screening report only.
Get my $49 reportFAQ
No. Remote Job Pay Checker provides a screening report and drafting aid. It does not replace advice from a qualified employment attorney.
It is for founders, HR teams, recruiters, and fractional HR operators preparing to publish one remote job posting in the United States.
Sometimes, but remote roles can trigger state pay transparency rules depending on employer size, reporting line, work location, and hiring footprint. Screen the draft before publishing.
In some covered states, yes. The checker flags missing benefits language where Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, or other included rules make benefits part of the posting review.
Paste the public-facing job draft, including location language, salary or hourly range, benefits, reporting line, and application deadline if available.
You receive an instant state-by-state screening table, missing-disclosure checklist, source links, and copy-ready disclosure language generated from deterministic rules.
No. The launch offer is a single automated report for one remote job posting.
No. The offer is intentionally self-serve: automated checks, source links, and drafting help only. It does not include attorney review, HR consulting, or manual edits.
No. The launch version screens Colorado, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Minnesota only. It is a focused launch product for common remote-posting disclosure checks, not a nationwide legal system.
Remote roles are harder to screen because one posting can touch multiple state pay transparency rules at once.
The MVP screens Colorado, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Minnesota because each has clear public source material and common remote-hiring relevance.
Yes, as a self-serve screening aid for one pasted posting at a time. The report helps identify obvious disclosure gaps before a draft is published or sent for deeper review.
Use the checklist and draft language to update the posting, then have the final version reviewed through your normal HR, recruiting, or legal process.